|
CAA-185
CFATS
DIESEL FUELS
EFCA
EXSTARS
Fall Protection
GD-GACT
MTSA
NAAQS
REACH
RFS
RICE
SPCC
TWIC Cards
TWIC Readers
State & Regional Issues
Archives
Government Links
|
LEGISLATION & RULES
Finding of Failure to Submit Certain State Implementation Plans Required for the
1-Hour Ozone NAAQS,
Federal Register January 5, 2010 – Final Rule
This notice finds that the State of California failed to submit State
Implementation Plans (SIPs) for three 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas. These
include:
-
Sacramento Metro Area, CA (Severe-15)
– Yolo/Solano Air Quality Management District portion; Feather River Air
Quality Management District portion; Placer County Air Pollution Control
District portion; El Dorado County Air Quality Management District portion.
-
Southeast
Desert Modified Air Quality Management Association (Severe-17)
-
Includes Coachella Valley
-
Los
Angeles-South Coast Air Basin (Extreme)
The finding
does not make a determination on whether or not these areas failed to meet their
attainment deadline, and therefore would be subsequently subject to penalty fees
under section 185 of the Clean Air Act. However, it does require California to
submit to EPA for approval SIPs for these nonattainment areas to establish
programs for assessing and collecting these section 185 fees. EPA issued
an internal guidance memo to assist State's
in developing approvable and appropriate fee
programs.
42 U.S.C. Sec.
7511d - Enforcement for Severe and Extreme Ozone Nonattainment Areas for Failure
to Attain
Requires states to collect fees from major source facilities located in severe
or extreme nonattainment ozone areas if the designated are within the state
fails to meet its attainment deadline. This policy is applicable to all ozone
standards set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency, including:
-
1991: EPA established a 1-hour
standard, setting the limit of 125 parts per billion.
-
-
1997:
EPA established an 8-hour primary and secondary standard, setting the limit
of 0.080 parts per million.
-
-
2008:
EPA revised the 8-hour primary and secondary standards, setting a new limit
of of 0.075 parts per million for both.
CAA 185 sets
the penalty amount as $5,000 per ton of excess emissions that exceed 80% of
baseline emissions, in 1990 dollars, adjusted annually for inflation. These
fees are to be collected annually until the area achieves attainment.
UPDATES,
COMMENTS & OTHER REPORTS
October 2009
In a
presentation to the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, EPA indicated that a
final guidance document for assessing and collecting fees under CAA 185 would be
available before year end. During the meeting, the Committee also dissolved its
Section 185 Workgroup.
May 2009 On
May 14, the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee’s Section 185 Workgroup gave a
presentation during the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Meeting. The
presentation outlined requirements and applicability of CAA 185 and draft
recommendations for EPA guidance to address implementation issues. For more
information, click here.
April 2009
EPA has identified eight nonattainment areas that may be subject to CAA 185 for
failure to comply with the 1-hour NAAQS for ozone. Under CAA 185, major source
facilities in these areas will be penalized for annual emissions that exceed 80
percent of a baseline emission level. Facilities will be assessed $5,000 per
ton of excess emissions, adjusted annually for inflation, beginning with the
calendar year following the attainment deadline.
November 15,
2005 Attainment Deadline – Fees will be assessed beginning with calendar year
2006.
-
Baltimore, MD
-
Baton
Rouge, LA
-
Sacramento, CA
November 15,
2007 Attainment Deadline – Fees will be assessed beginning with calendar year
2008.
-
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX
-
Northern
New Jersey, - Long Island – Connecticut (NY-NJ-CT)
-
Southeast
Desert Modified Air Quality Management District, CA
November 15,
2010 Attainment Deadline – Fees would be assessed beginning with calendar year
2011 should these areas fail to meet the deadline.
EPA is
expected to provide official guidance on how states should implement CAA 185.
EPA’s Clean Air Act Advisory Council has formed a Section 185 Workgroup
to focus on developing equivalence type alternatives to offset penalty
fees. For now, it seems that most states will need to write or revise their
State Implementation Plans to include provisions for assessing and collecting
these fees. In some cases, additional legislative action may be needed.
January 2009
The New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) indicated its intent to
assess facility VOC and Nox emission fees in 2009, pursuant to CAA 185.
According to NJDEP, this is based upon the failure of the NY/NJ Metropolitan
Air Quality Control Region to attain the 1-hour National Ambient Air Quality
Standard for Ozone by its 2007 attainment date. Affected companies would be
assessed penalty fees based on their 2008 emissions. NJDEP has indicated that
invoices would be sent out in December 2009. Payment of fees may be due as
early as January 31, 2010. However, NJDEP acknowledged that it may need to
develop new legislation in order to collect penalty fees.
EPA has also
confirmed that California is in the process of submitting revisions to its State
Implementation Plan to include language giving the state the authority to
collect CAA 185 fees from major sources in several regions.
Visit the
State & Regional Issues section of ILTA’s website for more
information on the potentially affected areas, specifically in New Jersey,
California, and New York.
March 2008
On
March 21, 2008, EPA released a
guidance document on
how to determine “baseline emissions” for purposes of assessing CAA 185 fees.
According to the EPA memo, baseline emissions are considered the lower amount of
either allowable permitted emissions or calendar year actual emissions. The
guidance document also included methods for calculating baseline emissions where
source emissions are irregular, cyclical or otherwise vary significantly.
|
June 8, 2007 U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit Ruling
South Coast Air Quality
Management District v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006)
|
|
Case History
|
-
40 CFR § 51.905 (e)
Asserts that CAA 185 and other CAA provisions for the 1-hour
National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone no longer are
applicable once the standard has been revoked by EPA.
-
70
FR 44470 Final
rule revokes the 1-hour ozone standard for all states, and codifies
provisions of an earlier rulemaking (69
FR 23858) that replaced the 1991 1-hour
standard with the 1997 8-hour National Air Quality Standard for
Ozone and re-designated areas of attainment and nonattainment.
-
South Coast Air Quality Management
District challenges EPA, claiming that the 1-hour standard still
applied to nonattainment areas due to anti-backsliding provisions
outlined in
40 CFR § 51.905 (a).
|
|
Court Ruling
|
-
Ruled that EPA improperly
determined that nonattainment areas would no longer be subjected to
the 1-hour ozone standard.
-
Reinstated the applicability of CAA
185 fees for nonattainment areas that were classified as severe or
extreme if attainment was not achieved by the areas attainment
deadline.
-
Ordered EPA to require that a
nonattainment area’s contingency measures be implemented if the area
fails to attain the 1-hour ozone standard.
|
RELATED ILTA ARTICLES
ILTA provides a monthly newsletter
to its membership. Members may log in to the Member Resources page to access
archived newsletters. The following is a list of articles ILTA has published in
its newsletter relating to CAA 185 provisions.
|