|
CFATS
GD-GACT
H.R. 2830
MVNRLM
NAAQS
OIAI
REACH
RFS
SPCC
TWIC
State & Regional Issues
State
Issues
Florida
Louisiana
New Jersey
Texas
Virginia
Regional
Issues
Archives
Government Links
|
IF MEMBERS WOULD LIKE TO RESPOND TO THIS
PROPOSED RULE, THERE ARE FEWER THAN FOUR WEEKS TO SUBMIT COMMENTS.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
recently issued a
proposed rulemaking to subject
volatile organic compound (VOC) storage tanks in the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria
(HGB) metropolitan area to more stringent control and monitoring requirements.
The proposed rule, published in the Texas
Register on Dec. 29, 2006 (p.10525 - 10535), would, among other things:
-
Prohibit floating roof
landings, except for inspection and maintenance purposes or for change of
product service. An option to maintain total tank emissions (including
landings) below a permitted cap would be allowed as an alternative to the
prohibition; and
-
Require more stringent
controls for tank fittings on floating roofs, including slotted guide poles
and other openings.
A public comment period ends February 12. Public
hearings have been proposed, including two in
Houston
on January 29th. The proposed rule adoption date is May 23, 2007 with a
required implementation date of January 1, 2009.
An Executive Summary of the proposed rule is
attached. This, plus the proposed rule and details on five public hearings may
be found under
Rule Project Number
2006-038-115-EN (Approval Date 12/13/06)
at the following website:
http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/rules/prop.html.
TCEQ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS:
Comments have been requested on these issues
within this proposed rule, among others:
-
The rule would specify that
a floating roof must be kept floating on the liquid surface at all times
except when it must be supported by its leg during initial fill and other
limited circumstances. Such circumstances would include required inspections
or maintenance, or for a change in service between incompatible
liquids. The term incompatible is to describe to "a material that
would be contaminated by the previously stored material." Thus, per TCEQ, one
gasoline with a lower Reid vapor pressure (RVP) in compliance with applicable
fuel requirements would be considered incompatible with a higher,
noncompliant, RVP gasoline." The commission seeks comment on this
definition. In particular, TCEQ seeks comment on how to address
"compatibility" switching between materials owned by different entities.
-
An alternative to the
proposed "landing ban" requirements would provide a compliance option where a
site-wide floating roof emissions cap could be established. TCEQ
seeks
comment on whether this is appropriate for the purpose of reducing roof
landing emissions. TCEQ
also seeks comment on additional exemptions to the proposed ban
on convenience
landings, and on other approaches to decrease emissions from tank landings.
Texas
Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP)
TexAQS II 2006 Emission
Fly-Over
RELATED ILTA ARTICLES
ILTA provides a monthly
newsletter to its membership. Members may log in to the Member Resources page to
access archived newsletters. The following is a list of articles ILTA has
published in its newsletter relating to state issues in Texas.
May
2006
September
2005
|