Home

Contact Us

Search

 

  WE HAVE CHANGED OUR NAME
 
International Liquid Terminals Association
  What's NewCalendar of EventsMembershipMember ResourcesIndustry NetworkLegislative & RegulatoryPublications

State Issues - Virginia

CFATS

GD-GACT

H.R. 2830

MVNRLM

NAAQS

OIAI

REACH

RFS

SPCC

TWIC

State & Regional Issues

     State Issues

          Florida

          Louisiana

          New Jersey

          Texas

          Virginia

     Regional Issues

 


 

Archives

 

Government Links

Chesapeake authorizes a permitting fee on flammable and combustible liquid tankage on the basis of ethanol emergency response preparedness.

During 2006, the City of Chesapeake, VA proposed a new tax, designated as a "permitting fee" for all bulk ethanol tankage within city limits.  In April of 2006, the Chesapeake municipal fire department expressed a concern regarding preparedness for responding to ethanol-related emergencies from increased ethanol volumes entering and traversing its community, thereby prompting the "fee".  The final proposal before a City Council vote was for a 0.5 ¢/gallon capacity, plus additional fees for tank truck, rail and barge deliveries.  This proposal reflected a change from the initial October, 2006 proposal of a single 3.5 ¢/gallon annual “fee” on ethanol tankage and was the basis for industry comment.  

On April 24, ILTA attended a Chesapeake, Virginia city council budget hearing to defend against these proposed terminal “fees”.  Joined by representatives from four member companies, ILTA spoke in opposition to the proposal on the basis of (1) the unprecedented nature of the proposed “fee” on a single product and sub-segment of industry, (2) the disconnect between concerns of transportation-related ethanol fires and 3rd party terminal responsibility, and (3) terminal industry efforts through the Ethanol Emergency Response Coalition (EERC) to educate the domestic emergency response community on materials and methods to effectively combat industrial ethanol fires.  ILTA submitted comments to the City Council first in October following the initial proposal, available here:

ILTA further submitted a comment letter to the city council on May 4th prior to their final vote, reinforcing ILTA statements made during the April budget hearing.  This letter is available here:

The city council has surprised many by voting on May 8 for a new fee structure to “offset the costs of training and equipment” necessary to respond to ethanol fires.  The ordinance, as passed, is available here:

Rather than limiting the fee to ethanol tankage as proposed, the new fee of 0.05 ¢/gallon will apply to all combustible or flammable liquid tanks larger than 100,000 gallons, greatly expanding the scope of the tax.

While projections of total revenue under the new scheme is similar to the flawed estimates proposed by the city earlier, the scope of products impacted has been significantly expanded, and further detaches the tax from the targeted concerns relating to ethanol.   This near complete departure from prior discussions between the municipality and industry leaves many concerned about the process followed.

Incidental to this new fee structure, as of June, permitting is underway for a $500 million, 216 million gallon ethanol manufacturing plant located partially in Chesapeake.  Operations are scheduled to begin in April of 2008.  If constructed, it will become one of the largest domestic ethanol refineries.

 

International Liquid Terminals Association

1444 I Street, NW #400   Washington, DC  20005  USA

Tel: (202) 842-9200   Fax: (202) 326-8660   E-mail: info@ilta.org   Internet: www.ilta.org

 

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1999-2008 ILTA