Terminals, tank farms, pipelines, bulk liquid storage, tankers, barges, transport and industry

Independent Liquid Terminals Association, serving the Bulk Liquid Storage and Transport Industry.

Search
Our Site:

Search ILTA Site

Contact us   Request Information  

Maritime Security

ILTA PROTESTS UNREASONABLE SECURITY REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY COAST GUARD

ILTA has requested the Coast Guard to withdraw or rescind a large number of security requirements imposed on bulk liquid terminals by “overly aggressive” Captains of the Port.  In a letter to Rear Admiral Larry Hereth, the Coast Guard’s Director of Port Security, ILTA asserted that some of these requirements are beyond the scope of the regulations that implement the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002.  ILTA also identified several types of procedural orders that it described as “contrary to the common sense approach” traditionally used by the Coast Guard in its regulation of port facilities.  The letter pointed out that these regulatory actions have created wide variations in security policies and enforcement procedures throughout the country, which amount to a major flaw in the national regulatory program.

Five specific issues were raised by ILTA:  (1) requiring 24/7 guards at bulk liquid terminals; (2) requiring security guards to screen marine transfers, trucks and railcars; (3) allowing insufficient time to comply with orders of inspectors; (4) requiring terminal loading racks to be included in restricted areas; and (5) threatening to order the shutdown of facilities.  For each issue, ILTA provided background information provided by ILTA members.  It also provided an analysis of the regulatory provisions relevant to each issue, as well as a statement of ILTA’s position.  ILTA pointed out that the access controls and compliance procedures are imposing severe economic hardship and irreparable harm on a large number of terminals.  These facilities are now facing sharp increases in personnel costs.  They are also adversely affected by the competitive advantage conferred on other terminals that are not subject to Coast Guard jurisdiction.

In requesting an immediate Coast Guard review of each issue, ILTA suggested that the review focus on the limits of the Coast Guard’s authority over facility security, as established by the actual language of the security regulations in 33 CFR 105.  ILTA also requested that the Coast Guard establish strict guidelines and procedural requirements that limit the regulatory discretion of the Captains of the Port to those actions expressly authorized by the regulations.  ILTA informed Admiral Hereth that it would welcome the opportunity to work with him and his staff in a joint effort to develop reasonable guidelines for facility access controls and compliance procedures.  This process will involve a substantial education effort by the terminal industry.  The Coast Guard needs to have a much better understanding of the security measures that are already being implemented at terminals.  More importantly, the Coast Guard needs to more carefully consider the actual security benefits of the measures it requires.

Download ILTA letter and Statement of Issues

 

Maritime Security Transportation Act (MTSA) - International Ship & Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) Help Desk

Maritime Security - Final Rule issued October 22, 2003

The final rule adopts, with changes, the temporary interim rule published earlier this year, requiring security measures in and around US ports.  The preamble to the final rule addresses individual comments on the temporary interim rule and then lists the changes made to the interim rule.

The difference in the final and interim rules are reflected in bold letters in the documents below:  In the Federal Register, the entire rule as changed is not restated.  Each of the final rules can be separately downloaded here in PDF format.

Regulation
33 CFR 101                General Provisions                   Federal Register version
33 CFR 103                Area Maritime Security             Federal Register version
33 CFR 104                Vessel Security                        Federal Register version
33 CFR 105                Facility Security                        Federal Register version
33 CFR 106                Outer Continental Shelf             Federal Register version
33 CFR 26, 161, 
     164, and 165          Automatic Identification            Federal Register version

The effective date of the final rule is November 21, 2003.

Important reminders:

·       All FSPs must be submitted in 2003.  Any plan submitted after December 31, 2003, is subject to a $25,000 administrative penalty.

·       No jurisdictional facility can operate after July 1, 2004, unless it has a Stage 2 approved plan or secures a “Letter of Authorization to Operate” (granted if a plan that is in the Stage 2 process is being amended).  Facilities in caretaker status do not require an FSP.

·       Owners or operators of facilities not in service on or before December 31, 2003, must comply with the final rule 60 days prior to beginning operations.

New MARSEC Directives have been issued in many COPT Zones.  These are Security Sensitive Information (SSI) and are provided on a  “need-to-know” basis.  Contact your local Marine Safety Office (MSO) for more information.

Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circulars (NVICs) are being revised to match the final rule.

The Coast Guard's Port Security Directorate (GM-P) Helpdesk can be contacted by phone at (202) 366-9991 or by e-mail uscgregs@comdt.uscg.mil with any questions, or visit their Web site for up-to the minute information and updates http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/mp/index.shtml.

Maritime Security - Interim Final Rule issued July 1, 2003

The U.S. Coast Guard has issued a massive “temporary interim rule” to implement the security requirements mandated by the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002.  The rule has been conveniently divided into six separate rules, including the “Facility Security” rule that covers all bulk liquid terminals subject to U.S. Coast Guard jurisdiction.  Each of the six interim rules can be separately downloaded here in PDF format:

Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives
Area Maritime Security
Vessel Security
Facility Security
Outer Continental Shelf Facility Security
Automatic Identification System; Vessel Carriage Requirement

Opportunity for Comments and Questions – The immediate priority for ILTA terminal members is to determine if there is anything in the Facility Security Rule that needs to be changed.  The Coast Guard will accept written comments through July 31, 2003.  In addition, the Coast Guard will hold a public meeting to answer questions on the rule and receive oral comments from interested parties.  The meeting will be held on July 23, 2003, in Washington, DC at the Grand Hyatt Hotel located at 1000 H Street, NW.  ILTA will participate in the meeting and will ask questions or make comments on behalf of terminal members.  Basically, the Coast Guard is offering the public the opportunity to call attention to any major mistakes or any regulatory language that obviously needs clarification.  The window has already closed for suggesting further policy changes.  The interim final rule will remain effective until November 25, 2003, when it will be replaced by a final rule. 

Download ILTA's Comments

   
 

Independent Liquid Terminals Association

1444 I Street, NW #400   Washington, DC  20005  USA

Tel: (202) 842-9200   Fax: (202) 326-8660   E-mail: info@ilta.org   Internet: www.ilta.org

 

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1999-2006 ILTA