ILTA Comments to the California Air Resource Board (CARB) on SB 253 and 261
International Liquid Terminals Association
  • Join

Newsletter

A respected industry publication for ILTA members, this monthly newsletter highlights legislative and regulatory activities affecting terminal facilities. It also provides news on recent business development within the terminal industry, including new construction, expansions, acquisitions and additions to ILTA's membership, as well as important information about ILTA's committee meetings, conferences and training events. ILTA also offers ILTA News Plus to members. This publication, sent on weeks that ILTA News is not published, aggregates industry and member news.

Read the Current Issue

2025 Newsletters

MarchFebruaryJanuary

2024 Newsletters

DecemberNovemberOctober | September | August | July | June | May | April | March | February | January

Not a member? Join ILTA today and stay up to date with weekly and monthly newsletters.

Jay Cruz

ILTA Comments to the California Air Resource Board (CARB) on SB 253 and 261

California Air Resource Board:

The International Liquid Terminals Association (ILTA) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the California Air Resource Board’s (“CARB”) California Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, and writes specifically in response to CARB’s implementation question(1)(d):

Should entities that sell energy, or other goods and services, into California through a separate market, like the energy imbalance market or extended day ahead market, be covered?

We write to strongly discourage CARB from including such entities under the definition of entities that “do[] business in California” as including them raises serious constitutional concerns. Specifically, a definition that included these entities would create significant Due Process concerns, as well as violate the Commerce Clause and notions of federalism by attempting to subject out-of-state entities to this law based on actions that have no or at best only a theoretical nexus to the State of California. CARB must adopt a reasonable definition of “doing business” in California in order to provide a clear and workable definition to regulated entities and to ensure its climate disclosure implementation rules are on sound legal footing.

Attached below is a copy of the full comments.

Previous Article Member Feature: Simone Wallace, Air Compliance Manager, Hartree Partners
Next Article ILTA Letter To The Trump Administration and Members of the 119th Congress
Print
65 Rate this article:
No rating

Documents to download

Please login or register to post comments.