Comments - International Liquid Terminals Association
International Liquid Terminals Association
  • Join

Newsletter

A respected industry publication for ILTA members, this monthly newsletter highlights legislative and regulatory activities affecting terminal facilities. It also provides news on recent business development within the terminal industry, including new construction, expansions, acquisitions and additions to ILTA's membership, as well as important information about ILTA's committee meetings, conferences and training events. ILTA also offers ILTA News Plus to members. This publication, sent on weeks that ILTA News is not published, aggregates industry and member news.

Read the Current Issue

2026 Newsletters

January

2025 Newsletters

DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruary | January


ILTA Comments on Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA).

Jay Cruz 0 11 Article rating: No rating

Dear Mr. Coyle:


The International Liquid Terminals Association (ILTA) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the January 27, 2026 preemption determination application submitted by ExxonMobil under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA). Founded in 1974, ILTA represents over 60 companies operating liquid terminals in all 50 states and in countries around the world. Terminals provide essential logistics services, support domestic and international trade, and foster the readiness of the United States armed forces by making fuels and liquid products available throughout the world—products such as petroleum fuels, aviation fuels, petrochemical products, chemicals, asphalt, alternative fuels like ethanol, and beyond. In particular, the U.S. gasoline distribution industry comprises a vast infrastructure network that moves finished gasoline and other liquid fuels from petroleum refineries to end markets, including government, commercial and industrial facilities, and retail fueling stations.


ILTA supports ExxonMobil’s request for determination that the New Jersey state court’s application of tort common law is preempted under the HMTA. Congress intended to achieve uniformity and prevent a “multiplicity of State and local regulations and the potential for varying as well as conflicting regulations in the area of hazardous materials transportation.”1 The New Jersey Court’s decision would impose a series of unnecessary, state-specific, additional or different requirements affecting the transportation of gasoline. These requirements would hinder the flow of gasoline in interstate commerce and could lead to the very patchwork of state requirements that Congress intended to prevent. The state court’s decision contradicts the plain language of the HMTA and the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) in the following ways and should be preempted.

Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Emergency Response Standard; Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Christopher Meilink 0 1011 Article rating: No rating

Dear Assistant Secretary Parker,

On behalf of the Employers Emergency Response Rulemaking Coalition (“Coalition”), I am submitting the following comments on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (“OSHA”) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) for a new “Emergency Response Standard,” to replace the existing “Fire Brigades Standard,” 29 C.F.R. § 1910.156, Docket No. OSHA-2007-0073, published in the Federal Register on February 5, 2024.

INTRODUCTION

The Employers Emergency Response Rulemaking Coalition is composed of a broad array of industries impacted by OSHA’s proposed rule. The Coalition is comprised of multiple organizations, including trade associations, representing thousands of facilities located across the United States. Included among its members are companies in petroleum refining, chemical and petrochemical manufacturing, liquid terminal operations, agriculture, aerospace and defense, and other industries. Coalition members are leaders in safety and privately embedded emergency response programs that have a substantial interest in the outcome of OSHA’s rulemaking, as it will have a significant impact on how they manage such programs.

For years, Coalition members have voluntarily implemented effective emergency response programs. In that time, our members learned valuable lessons about the practices and policies that most effectively prevent and mitigate risks to our emergency responders. The comments we share represent the collective wisdom of employers and the employees who respond to emergencies. Our objective is to ensure that OSHA’s Emergency Response Standard effectively protects the safety and health of employees, volunteers, and the surrounding community, utilizing the most reasonable set of requirements possible.

Attached below is a copy of the full comments.

ILTA's Petition for Reconsideration and Rulemaking, National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Gasoline Distribution Facilities and the Standards of Performance

Jay Cruz 0 1544 Article rating: No rating

Dear Administrator Regan:

The International Liquid Terminals Association (“ILTA”) hereby petitions the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA” or “Agency”), pursuant to Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”),1 to reconsider, initiate rulemaking and amend portions of its final rule entitled National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Gasoline Distribution Technology Reviews and New Source Performance Standards Review for Bulk Gasoline Terminals, 89 Fed. Reg. 39304 (May 8, 2024)

RSS
12345